Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35495034›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Classification of Whisker Deflections From Evoked Responses in the Somatosensory Barrel Cortex With Spiking Neural Networks.

Horst Petschenig, Marta Bisio, Marta Maschietto, Alessandro Leparulo, Robert Legenstein, Stefano Vassanelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Horst PetschenigFaculty of Computer Science and Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Theoretical Computer Science, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Marta BisioNeuroChip Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Marta MaschiettoNeuroChip Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Alessandro LeparuloNeuroChip Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Robert LegensteinFaculty of Computer Science and Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Theoretical Computer Science, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Stefano VassanelliNeuroChip Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
University of Padua · ITGraz University of Technology · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spike-based neuromorphic hardware has great potential for low-energy brain-machine interfaces, leading to a novel paradigm for neuroprosthetics where spiking neurons in silicon read out and control activity of brain circuits. Neuromorphic processors can receive rich information about brain activity from both spikes and local field potentials (LFPs) recorded by implanted neural probes. However, it was unclear whether spiking neural networks (SNNs) implemented on such devices can effectively process that information. Here, we demonstrate that SNNs can be trained to classify whisker deflections of different amplitudes from evoked responses in a single barrel of the rat somatosensory cortex. We show that the classification performance is comparable or even superior to state-of-the-art machine learning approaches. We find that SNNs are rather insensitive to recorded signal type: both multi-unit spiking activity and LFPs yield similar results, where LFPs from cortical layers III and IV seem better suited than those of deep layers. In addition, no hand-crafted features need to be extracted from the data-multi-unit activity can directly be fed into these networks and a simple event-encoding of LFPs is sufficient for good performance. Furthermore, we find that the performance of SNNs is insensitive to the network state-their performance is similar during UP and DOWN states.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiomarkercomputingcortical microcircuitsliquid state machineneural codingneural decodingspiking neural network

Identifiers

PMID35495034
PMCPMC9047904
OpenAlexW4223926325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.