Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35494952›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (BNT162b2) Side Effects: A Systematic Review.

Ibrahim M Dighriri, Khaled M Alhusayni, Ahmed Y Mobarki, Ibrahim S Aljerary, Khalid A Alqurashi, Fai A Aljuaid, Khalid A Alamri, Abeer A Mutwalli, Nada A Maashi, Alwaleed M Aljohani and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Epidemiologic and clinical updates on viral infections in Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. COVID-19 vaccines: current and future challenges.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ibrahim M DighririDepartment of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, SAU.
Khaled M AlhusayniDepartment of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, SAU.
Ahmed Y MobarkiDepartment of Medical Laboratory, The Regional Laboratory and the Central Blood Bank, Abha, SAU.
Ibrahim S AljeraryDepartment of Pharmacy, King Faisal Hospital, Makkah, SAU.
Khalid A AlqurashiDepartment of Pharmacy, Taif University, Taif, SAU.
Fai A AljuaidDepartment of Pharmacy, Taif University, Taif, SAU.
Khalid A AlamriDepartment of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital Vaccination Center, Taif, SAU.
Abeer A MutwalliDepartment of Pharmacy, King Faisal Hospital, Makkah, SAU.
Nada A MaashiDepartment of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Alwaleed M AljohaniDepartment of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Abdulrahman M AlqarniDepartment of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Athbah E AlfaqihDepartment of Medicine, Umm Alqura University, Makkah, SAU.
Sumiya M MoazamDepartment of Medicine, Aseer Central Hospital, Abha, SAU.
Muath N AlmutairiDepartment of Medicine, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU.
Afnan N AlmutairiDepartment of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU.
Jazan University · SAUmm al-Qura University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccinations prevented severe clinical complications of COVID-19. It was considered a vital component of living endemically with COVID-19. The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is the first mRNA-based vaccination that enhances immunity. Resulting in various adverse effects that may emerge after vaccination. This systematic review was undertaken to assess the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine side effects by reviewing the previous studies. A total of 107 PubMed and Google Scholar publications were screened for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine side effects. Fourteen articles met the study inclusion criteria. The included searching terms were a combination of "Pfizer vaccine and Side effects," "BioNTech vaccine and side effects," and "BNT162b2 vaccine and side effects," as well as all synonyms. The total number of participants in the 14 studies was 10,632 participants. Average of the most frequent side effects of 14 studies were injection site pain 77.34%, fatigue 43%, muscle pain 39.67%, local swelling 33.57%, headache 33.27%, joint pain 25.75%, chills 18.34%, fever 18%, itching 9.38%, lymph nodes swelling 7.86%, nausea 7.58%, dyspnea 7.86%,and diarrhea 6.36%. The average side effects after the first dose were 79% compared with 84% after the second dose. The average occurs side effects in females at 69.8% compared with males 30.2%. Our study reveals that side effects after the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine are common, but they are usually mild and self-limited. Local reactions like pain at the injection site are the most common. Anaphylactic shock or severe reactions are rare. We hope that our results will reassure the public that the benefits of vaccination far exceed the dangers. Also, help reduce vaccine hesitancy among individuals worried about vaccine safety and possible adverse effects.

Indexed as

allergic reactionbiontech covid-19 vaccinebnt162b2 vaccine.pfizer vaccineside effects

Identifiers

PMID35494952
PMCPMC9039171
OpenAlexW4220784865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.