ArticleCureus2022
Conducting Virtual Focus Groups During the COVID-19 Epidemic Utilizing Videoconferencing Technology: A Feasibility Study.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Participatory Action Research and Knowledge Dissemination in Virtual Photovoice: Methodological Insights.Qualitative health research · 2026Article
- Article
- The Influence of Food Colors on Emotional Perception and Consumer Acceptance: A Sensory and Emotional Profiling Approach in Gastronomy.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Processes Underpinning Successful Co-Design: Lessons From a Digital Health Project.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Preferences and perceived barriers for internet-based treatment among adolescents with anxiety or depressive disorders: A qualitative study.Internet interventions · 2024Article
- Strategies to optimise the health equity impact of digital pain self-reporting tools: a series of multi-stakeholder focus groups.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Employer representatives' experiences of supporting employees with cognitive impairments in a digital work environment.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Development and validation of Simulation Scenario Quality Instrument (SSQI).BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Hidden and Understaffed: Exploring Canadian Medical Laboratory Technologists' Pandemic Stressors and Lessons Learned.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- "Looking beyond Mental Health Stigma": An Online Focus Group Study among Senior Undergraduate Nursing Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Impact of online learning on sense of belonging among first year clinical health students during COVID-19: student and academic perspectives.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Puerperal women's satisfaction with the obstetric services received: improvement of an assessment instrument.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2023Article
- Going virtual during the COVID-19 pandemic: adaptation of a mixed-methods dietary behavior study within a community-based participatory research study of African-American adults at risk for cardiovascular disease.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the world has seen a surge in utilizing videoconferencing technology. It can be a useful approach for qualitative research. This study describes the feasibility of virtual focus groups in qualitative research. Methods Videoconferencing software was used to conduct virtual focus groups. A dry run was conducted a day before the focus group to ensure the research team was acquainted with the software on the focus group day. Results Using distance videoconferencing software was cost-effective compared to face-to-face focus groups. The moderator was responsible for leading the discussion virtually. Unlike in-person focus groups, the virtual focus group scheduling was flexible, and it was easier to find replacements for participants who dropped out. Conclusion This study found that conducting virtual focus groups utilizing videoconferencing software was time-saving and cost-efficient compared to face-to-face focus groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.