ReviewCureus2022
Bone Mineral Density Post a Spinal Cord Injury: A Review of the Current Literature Guidelines.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vitamin D Supplementation Adjunct to Home-Based Electrical Stimulation Exercise Program Versus Passive Movement Training in Chronic SCI: Individual Results From Trial Under Accrual.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Regulation of cAMP levels in osteocytes by mechano-sensitive focal adhesion kinase and phosphodiesterase 8A.iScience · 2026Article
- High prevalence of low bone mineral density in wheelchair users regardless of sports participation: a cross-sectional analysis of the bonewheel study.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- A neurological prognostic nomogram integrating biomarkers and clinical indicators for surgically treated patients with osteoporotic spinal fracture and spinal cord injury.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Review of osteokines in spinal cord injury: potential biomarkers during rehabilitation.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Review
- Neurogenic Aging After Spinal Cord Injury: Highlighting the Unique Characteristics of Aging After Spinal Cord Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Characteristics Associated with Bone Loss after Spinal Cord Injury: Implications for Hip Region Vulnerability.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Article
- Causal associations of brain structure with bone mineral density: a large-scale genetic correlation study.Bone research · 2023Article
- Review
- Review
- Basal Metabolic Rate Versus Dietary Vitamin D and Calcium Intakes and the Association With Body Composition and Bone Health After Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpinal cord injury (SCI) causes rapid osteoporosis below the level of injury in a multi-factorial manner. This literature review focused on the early diagnosis of low bone mass (LBM) in SCI patients and aimed to summarize all the available recent data on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in this unique patient population. Materials and Methods: Advanced literature research was conducted in the online PubMed database using the keywords 'bone mineral density, 'spinal cord injury, 'skeletal fragility', and 'osteoporotic fractures'. Out of the initial 430 articles, duplicates were removed and the remaining studies were assessed for eligibility. Two reviewers independently extracted data from each study and assessed variable reporting of outcome data. The exclusion criteria were: studies not measuring bone mineral density (BMD), studies comparing SCI to other diseases, animal studies, molecular studies, studies including children, and studies not written in English. The 83 remaining papers were divided into studies focusing on treatment and studies investigating LBM in SCI. Following this step, studies with small patient samples set at 20 patients with SCI for the treatment group and 30 patients for the diagnosis of the LBM group, were also excluded.
resultsIn the remaining 32 studies, 18 focused on the diagnosis of LBM in SCI and 14 focused on the various treatment options to address this phenomenon. Most of these studies (n=13) used the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) method to evaluate bone mass while five studies preferred quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements and one evaluated LBM using calcaneal qualitative ultrasound. In the treatment group of studies, seven papers administered medication to address LBM and four clinical protocols used physiotherapy methods to reduce bone loss post-SCI while three studies combined medical treatment with physiotherapy.
conclusionThe unawareness of the unique mechanism through which bone is rapidly lost in the first months post-SCI led to initial scientific confusion. In this review, we summarize information to increase physicians' awareness of the dangers of 'silent' osteoporosis progression post-SCI. We have also provided information on the best timing to evaluate bone loss as well as treatment options that could prevent fragility fractures in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.