ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2022
How to get best predictions for road monitoring using machine learning techniques.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated Road Defect and Anomaly Detection for Traffic Safety: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- Dynamic Road Anomaly Detection: Harnessing Smartphone Accelerometer Data with Incremental Concept Drift Detection and Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Abnormal Pavement Condition Detection with Vehicle Posture Data Considering Speed Variations.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of data representation techniques for vibration based road surface condition classification.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A Road Defect Detection System Using Smartphones.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Vibration-Based Methodology to Monitor Road Surface: A Process to Overcome the Speed Effect.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Road condition monitoring is essential for improving traffic safety and reducing accidents. Machine learning methods have recently gained prominence in the practically important task of controlling road surface quality. Several systems have been proposed using sensors, especially accelerometers present in smartphones due to their availability and low cost. However, these methods require practitioners to specify an exact set of features from all the sensors to provide more accurate results, including the time, frequency, and wavelet-domain signal features. It is important to know the effect of these features change on machine learning model performance in handling road anomalies classification tasks. Thus, we address such a problem by conducting a sensitivity analysis of three machine learning models which are Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, and Multi-Layer Perceptron to test the effectiveness of the model by selecting features. We built a feature vector from all three axes of the sensors that boosts classification performance. Our proposed approach achieved an overall accuracy of 94% on four types of road anomalies. To allow an objective analysis of different features, we used available accelerometer datasets. Our objective is to achieve a good classification performance of road anomalies by distinguishing between significant and relatively insignificant features. Our chosen baseline machine learning models are based on their comparative simplicity and powerful empirical performance. The extensive analysis results of our study provide practical advice for practitioners wishing to select features effectively in real-world settings for road anomalies detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.