Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35494833›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2022

A novel CAPTCHA solver framework using deep skipping Convolutional Neural Networks.

Shida Lu, Kai Huang, Talha Meraj, Hafiz Tayyab Rauf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shida LuState Grid Information & Communication Company, SMEPC, Shanghai, China.
Kai HuangShanghai Shineenergy Information Technology Development Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Talha MerajCOMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Hafiz Tayyab RaufUniversity of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Completely Automated Public Turing Test to tell Computers and Humans Apart (CAPTCHA) is used in web systems to secure authentication purposes; it may break using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) type methods. CAPTCHA breakers make web systems highly insecure. However, several techniques to break CAPTCHA suggest CAPTCHA designers about their designed CAPTCHA's need improvement to prevent computer vision-based malicious attacks. This research primarily used deep learning methods to break state-of-the-art CAPTCHA codes; however, the validation scheme and conventional Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) design still need more confident validation and multi-aspect covering feature schemes. Several public datasets are available of text-based CAPTCHa, including Kaggle and other dataset repositories where self-generation of CAPTCHA datasets are available. The previous studies are dataset-specific only and cannot perform well on other CAPTCHA's. Therefore, the proposed study uses two publicly available datasets of 4- and 5-character text-based CAPTCHA images to propose a CAPTCHA solver. Furthermore, the proposed study used a skip-connection-based CNN model to solve a CAPTCHA. The proposed research employed 5-folds on data that delivers 10 different CNN models on two datasets with promising results compared to the other studies.

Indexed as

CAPTCHaCNNComputer visionDeep learningOptical Character Recognition

Identifiers

PMID35494833
PMCPMC9044336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.