Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35494831›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2022

Multi-label emotion classification of Urdu tweets.

Noman Ashraf, Lal Khan, Sabur Butt, Hsien-Tsung Chang, Grigori Sidorov, Alexander Gelbukh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Noman AshrafCIC, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico.
Lal KhanDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1624-7580
Sabur ButtCIC, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4056-8923
Hsien-Tsung ChangDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4987-5943
Grigori SidorovCIC, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alexander GelbukhCIC, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-7845-9039

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urdu is a widely used language in South Asia and worldwide. While there are similar datasets available in English, we created the first multi-label emotion dataset consisting of 6,043 tweets and six basic emotions in the Urdu Nastalíq script. A multi-label (ML) classification approach was adopted to detect emotions from Urdu. The morphological and syntactic structure of Urdu makes it a challenging problem for multi-label emotion detection. In this paper, we build a set of baseline classifiers such as machine learning algorithms (Random forest (RF), Decision tree (J48), Sequential minimal optimization (SMO), AdaBoostM1, and Bagging), deep-learning algorithms (Convolutional Neural Networks (1D-CNN), Long short-term memory (LSTM), and LSTM with CNN features) and transformer-based baseline (BERT). We used a combination of text representations: stylometric-based features, pre-trained word embedding, word-based n-grams, and character-based n-grams. The paper highlights the annotation guidelines, dataset characteristics and insights into different methodologies used for Urdu based emotion classification. We present our best results using micro-averaged F1, macro-averaged F1, accuracy, Hamming loss (HL) and exact match (EM) for all tested methods.

Indexed as

Deep learningEmotion classification in UrduEmotion detectionMachine learningMulti-label emotion detectionNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID35494831
PMCPMC9044368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.