Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35494817›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2022

Negation and uncertainty detection in clinical texts written in Spanish: a deep learning-based approach.

Oswaldo Solarte Pabón, Orlando Montenegro, Maria Torrente, Alejandro Rodríguez González, Mariano Provencio, Ernestina Menasalvas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Oswaldo Solarte PabónCentro de Tecnología Biomédica, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Orlando MontenegroEscuela de Ingeniería de Sistemas y Computación, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Maria TorrenteHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.
Alejandro Rodríguez GonzálezCentro de Tecnología Biomédica, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Mariano ProvencioHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.
Ernestina MenasalvasCentro de Tecnología Biomédica, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid · ESHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESUniversidad del Valle · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting negation and uncertainty is crucial for medical text mining applications; otherwise, extracted information can be incorrectly identified as real or factual events. Although several approaches have been proposed to detect negation and uncertainty in clinical texts, most efforts have focused on the English language. Most proposals developed for Spanish have focused mainly on negation detection and do not deal with uncertainty. In this paper, we propose a deep learning-based approach for both negation and uncertainty detection in clinical texts written in Spanish. The proposed approach explores two deep learning methods to achieve this goal: (i) Bidirectional Long-Short Term Memory with a Conditional Random Field layer (BiLSTM-CRF) and (ii) Bidirectional Encoder Representation for Transformers (BERT). The approach was evaluated using NUBES and IULA, two public corpora for the Spanish language. The results obtained showed an F-score of 92% and 80% in the scope recognition task for negation and uncertainty, respectively. We also present the results of a validation process conducted using a real-life annotated dataset from clinical notes belonging to cancer patients. The proposed approach shows the feasibility of deep learning-based methods to detect negation and uncertainty in Spanish clinical texts. Experiments also highlighted that this approach improves performance in the scope recognition task compared to other proposals in the biomedical domain.

Indexed as

Clinical textsDeep learningNatural Language ProcessingNegation and Uncertainty detectionText mining

Identifiers

PMID35494817
PMCPMC9044225
OpenAlexW4220913575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.