Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35494807›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2022

Evaluation of cultivated land quality using attention mechanism-back propagation neural network.

Yulin Liu, Jiaolong Li, Chuang Liu, Jiangshu Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yulin LiuCollege of Information Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Jiaolong LiCollege of Information Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Chuang LiuCollege of Information Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Jiangshu WeiCollege of Information Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultivated land quality is related to the quality and safety of agricultural products and to ecological safety. Therefore, reasonably evaluating the quality of land, which is helpful in identifying its benefits, is crucial. However, most studies have used traditional methods to estimate cultivated land quality, and there is little research on using deep learning for this purpose. Using Ya'an cultivated land as the research object, this study constructs an evaluation system for cultivated land quality based on seven aspects, including soil organic matter and soil texture. An attention mechanism (AM) is introduced into a back propagation (BP) neural network model. Therefore, an AM-BP neural network that is suitable for Ya'an cultivated land is designed. The sample is divided into training and test sets by a ratio of 7:3. We can output the evaluation results of cultivated land quality through experiments. Furthermore, they can be visualized through a pie chart. The experimental results indicate that the model effect of the AM-BP neural network is better than that of the BP neural network. That is, the mean square error is reduced by approximately 0.0019 and the determination coefficient is increased by approximately 0.005. In addition, this study obtains better results via the ensemble model. The quality of cultivated land in Yucheng District is generally good, i.e.,mostly third and fourth grades. It conforms to the normal distribution. Lastly, the method has certain to evaluate cultivated land quality, providing a reference for future cultivated land quality evaluation.

Indexed as

Attention MechanismBP neural networkCultivated land qualityDeep learning

Identifiers

PMID35494807
PMCPMC9044315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.