ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2022
Hands to Hexapods, Wearable User Interface Design for Specifying Leg Placement for Legged Robots.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Specifying leg placement is a key element for legged robot control, however current methods for specifying individual leg motions with human-robot interfaces require mental concentration and the use of both arm muscles. In this paper, a new control interface is discussed to specify leg placement for hexapod robot by using finger motions. Two mapping methods are proposed and tested with lab staff, Joint Angle Mapping (JAM) and Tip Position Mapping (TPM). The TPM method was shown to be more efficient. Then a manual controlled gait based on TPM is compared with fixed gait and camera-based autonomous gait in a Webots simulation to test the obstacle avoidance performance on 2D terrain. Number of Contacts (NOC) for each gait are recorded during the tests. The results show that both the camera-based autonomous gait and the TPM are effective methods in adjusting step size to avoid obstacles. In high obstacle density environments, TPM reduces the number of contacts to 25% of the fixed gaits, which is even better than some of the autonomous gaits with longer step size. This shows that TPM has potential in environments and situations where autonomous footfall planning fails or is unavailable. In future work, this approach can be improved by combining with haptic feedback, additional degrees of freedom and artificial intelligence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.