ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022
Correlation Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics and Prognosis of Invasive Pituitary Adenomas in Neurosurgery Hospitals.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Models in Growth-Hormone- and Prolactin-Secreting Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Retracted: Correlation Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics and Prognosis of Invasive Pituitary Adenomas in Neurosurgery Hospitals.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-06-28Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/8CF59830BEC857C8A11A9EDA5E583B
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of pituitary adenoma is second only to glioma and meningioma, and its incidence ranks third among intracranial tumors. Most pituitary adenomas are benign and noninvasive tumors, but invasive pituitary adenomas pose a great threat to human health. In order to explore the risk factors that affect the clinical aggressive behavior of patients with pituitary adenoma, analyze the correlation between different classification methods and clinical aggressive behavior, and lay the foundation for early judgment and individualized treatment of clinical aggressive behavior of patients with pituitary adenoma. We conducted statistical research on patients who were treated for pituitary adenomas in the city's Yangzhou Hongquan Hospital. The results of the study showed that six patients in this study showed aggressiveness in the clinical symptomatic outcome, six patients showed aggressiveness in the serological outcome, and seven patients showed aggressiveness in imaging. In the multimodal classification, the clinical aggressiveness of pituitary adenomas in the invasion + atypical group was significantly higher than that in other groups, and the difference was statistically significant (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.