Trial reportJournal of healthcare engineering2022
Analysis of Rapid Rehabilitation Effect of Children with Severe Viral Encephalitis Based on Continuous Nursing of Omaha System.
Trial report in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: Analysis of Rapid Rehabilitation Effect of Children with Severe Viral Encephalitis Based on Continuous Nursing of Omaha System.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-12Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To establish the Omaha System-based intensive care of children with viral encephalitis, compared with the conventional nursing applied in children with severe viral encephalitis for children with clinical symptoms, motor function, the incidence of complications, and the influence of quality of life, to intensive care of children with viral encephalitis way provide certain scientific basis. Methods: 62 cases of severe viral encephalitis diagnosed and treated in our hospital from X month 20XX to X month 20XX were randomly divided into 31 cases of intervention group and 31 cases of control group. The control group received routine nursing, and the intervention group added Omaha system on the basis of the control group. The recovery time of clinical symptoms and signs, FMA score, disability rate, quality of life, and satisfaction of family members were compared between the two groups. Results: The recovery time of clinical signs in the intervention group was shorter than that in the control group. Motor function was improved in both groups, but the improvement effect in intervention group was higher than that in control group. The quality of life in both groups was improved 1-3 months after discharge, but the improvement effect in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group. The incidence of physical dysfunction and behavioral abnormalities was low in the pregroup, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( Conclusion: Omaha system nursing can significantly reduce the recovery time of clinical signs, improve FMA score, reduce disability rate, and improve the quality of life and family satisfaction of children with severe viral encephalitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.