Article in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Zhipeng YangState Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University 300350 Tianjin People's Republic of China z.wang@tju.edu.cn.
Jun LiState Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University 300350 Tianjin People's Republic of China z.wang@tju.edu.cn.
Panmei LiuState Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University 300350 Tianjin People's Republic of China z.wang@tju.edu.cn.
An ZhangState Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University 300350 Tianjin People's Republic of China z.wang@tju.edu.cn.
Jing WangState Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University 300350 Tianjin People's Republic of China z.wang@tju.edu.cn.
Yuan HuangState Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University 300350 Tianjin People's Republic of China z.wang@tju.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3115-4152
Jiangyong WangDepartment of Physics, Shantou University 515063 Shantou People's Republic of China.
Zumin WangState Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University 300350 Tianjin People's Republic of China z.wang@tju.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7161-3312
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
In this work, nanoporous gold (NPG) fabricated using a modified solid-phase reaction method was developed as an electrocatalyst for the nonenzymatic detection of hydrogen peroxide (H
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Highly sensitive non-enzymatic hydrogen peroxide monitoring platform based on nanoporous gold · full record | OpenQuestion