Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35494280›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2022

Knotted Versus Knotless Medial-Row Transosseous-Equivalent Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repairs Have Similar Clinical and Functional Outcomes.

Daniel Nemirov, Zachary Herman, Ryan W Paul, Ari Clements, Matthew Beucherie, Joseph Brutico, Christopher J Hadley, Michael G Ciccotti, Kevin B Freedman, Brandon J Erickson and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel NemirovSidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Zachary HermanSidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Ryan W PaulRothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Ari ClementsSidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Matthew BeucherieSidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Joseph BruticoRothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Christopher J HadleyRothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Michael G CiccottiRothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Kevin B FreedmanRothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Brandon J EricksonRothman Orthopaedic Institute, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Sommer HammoudRothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Meghan E BishopRothman Orthopaedic Institute, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Rothman Orthopaedics · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To retrospectively investigate the clinical and functional outcomes of patients who underwent knotted medial-row rotator cuff repair (KT-RCR) compared with patients who underwent knotless medial-row rotator cuff repair (KL-RCR). Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent double-row transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair in 2016 was performed at a single institution with 2-year follow-up. Information regarding demographic characteristics, preoperative tear size (magnetic resonance imaging), surgical variables (including method of suture stabilization), preoperative and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and all complications (e.g., cuff failure, adhesive capsulitis, and persistent pain) was compiled. Results: A total of 189 patients met the inclusion criteria: 72 in the KL-RCR group and 117 in the KT-RCR group. No significant difference in preoperative ASES scores was found between the KL-RCR and KT-RCR groups (48.3 vs 45.4, Conclusions: The knotted approach and knotless approach to double-row rotator cuff repair showed similar outcome scores, cuff failure rates, and complication rates at minimum 2-year follow-up. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective therapeutic comparative trial.

Identifiers

PMID35494280
PMCPMC9042748
OpenAlexW3214892627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.