Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35494249›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

Deep neural network modeling identifies biomarkers of response to immune-checkpoint therapy.

Yuqi Kang, Siddharth Vijay, Taranjit S Gujral

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Virtual patient analysis identifies strategies to improve the performance of predictive biomarkers for PD-1 blockade.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Artificial Intelligence in Metabolomics: A Current Review.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuqi KangDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Siddharth VijayDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Taranjit S GujralDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy has shown significant promise as a treatment for cancer, such as lung cancer and melanoma. However, only 10%-30% of the patients respond to treatment with immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs), underscoring the need for biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy. Here, we developed DeepGeneX, a computational framework that uses advanced deep neural network modeling and feature elimination to reduce single-cell RNA-seq data on ∼26,000 genes to six of the most important genes (

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCancerGene networkImmune responseNeural networks

Identifiers

PMID35494249
PMCPMC9044175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.