Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35494065›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Application Value of Radiomic Nomogram in the Differential Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer and Hyperplasia.

Shaogao Gui, Min Lan, Chaoxiong Wang, Si Nie, Bing Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shaogao GuiDepartment of Radiology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China.
Min LanDepartment of Orthopedics, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China.
Chaoxiong WangDepartment of Radiology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China.
Si NieDepartment of Radiology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China.
Bing FanDepartment of Radiology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Prostate cancer and hyperplasia require different treatment strategies and have completely different outcomes; thus, preoperative identification of prostate cancer and hyperplasia is very important. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the application value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived radiomic nomogram based on T2-weighted images (T2WI) in differentiating prostate cancer and hyperplasia. Materials and Methods: One hundred forty-six patients (66 cases of prostate cancer and 80 cases of prostate hyperplasia) who were confirmed by surgical pathology between September 2019 and September 2019 were selected. We manually delineated T2WI of all patients using ITK-SNAP software and radiomic analysis using Analysis Kit (AK) software. A total of 396 tumor texture features were extracted. Subsequently, the effective features were selected using the LASSO algorithm, and the radiomic feature model was constructed. Next, combined with independent clinical risk factors, a multivariate Logistic regression model was used to establish a radiomic nomogram. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the prediction performance of the radiomic nomogram. Finally, the clinical application value of the nomogram was evaluated by decision curve analysis. Results: The PSA and the selected imaging features were significantly correlated with the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer and hyperplasia. The radiomic model had good discrimination efficiency for prostate cancer and hyperplasia. The training set (AUC = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77-0.92) and testing set (AUC = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.96) were effective. The radiomic nomogram, combined with the radiomic characteristics of MRI and independent clinical risk factors, showed better differentiation efficiency in the training set (AUC = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.85-0.97) and testing set (AUC = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.81-0.99). The decision curve showed the clinical application value of the radiomic nomogram. Conclusion: The radiomic nomogram of T2-MRI combined with clinical risk factors can easily identify prostate cancer and hyperplasia. It also provides suggestions for further clinical events.

Indexed as

hyperplasiamagnetic resonance imagingprostate cancerradiomictextural features

Identifiers

PMID35494065
PMCPMC9047828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.