Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35494050›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Evaluation of Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted Imaging for Risk Factors in Stage I Endometrial Cancer: A Comparison With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging.

Xingxing Jin, Ruifang Yan, Zhong Li, Gaiyun Zhang, Wenling Liu, Hongxia Wang, Meng Zhang, Jinxia Guo, Kaiyu Wang, Dongming Han

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xingxing JinDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Ruifang YanDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Zhong LiDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Gaiyun ZhangDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Wenling LiuDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Hongxia WangDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Meng ZhangDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Jinxia GuoMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Research China, General Electric (GE) Healthcare, Beijing, China.
Kaiyu WangMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Research China, General Electric (GE) Healthcare, Beijing, China.
Dongming HanDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University · CNUnited Imaging Healthcare (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecologic malignancies in clinical practice. This study aimed to compare the value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), and amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) in the assessment of risk stratification factors for stage I EC including histological subtype, grade, stage, and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). Methods: A total of 72 patients with stage I EC underwent pelvic MRI. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), mean diffusivity (MD), mean kurtosis (MK), and magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym at 3.5 ppm) were calculated and compared in risk groups with the Mann-Whitney Results: There were significantly greater MTRasym (3.5 ppm) and MK and significantly lower ADC and MD in the non-adenocarcinoma, stage IB, LVSI-positive, high-grade, and non-low-risk groups (all Conclusions: Although similar performance was obtained with each individual parameter of APTWI, DWI, and DKI for the noninvasive assessment of aggressive behavior in stage I EC, the combination of MD, MK, and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) provided improved predictive power for non-low-risk stage I EC and may serve as a superior imaging marker.

Indexed as

amide proton transfer-weighted imagingdiffusion kurtosis imagingdiffusion-weighted imagingendometrial cancerrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID35494050
PMCPMC9047827
OpenAlexW4224130934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.