Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35493873›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2020

Applicability of electro-osmotic flow for the analysis of the surface zeta potential.

Olivija Plohl, Lidija Fras Zemljič, Sanja Potrč, Thomas Luxbacher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chemical Profiling, Formulation Development,Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olivija PlohlUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Characterization and Processing of Polymers Smetanova 17 2000 Maribor Slovenia olivija.plohl@um.si.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0620-6141
Lidija Fras ZemljičUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Characterization and Processing of Polymers Smetanova 17 2000 Maribor Slovenia olivija.plohl@um.si.
Sanja PotrčUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Characterization and Processing of Polymers Smetanova 17 2000 Maribor Slovenia olivija.plohl@um.si.
Thomas LuxbacherAnton-Paar GmbH Anton-Paar-Str. 20 A-8054 Graz Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5472-8203

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of the surface zeta potential (SZP) opens up new possibilities in the characterization of various materials used for scientific or industrial applications. It provides at the same time insight into the material surface chemistry and elucidates the interactions with charged species in the aqueous test solution. For this purpose, an accurate, reliable and repeatable analysis of the SZP is the key factor. This work focuses on a detailed and systematic comparison of two electrokinetic techniques,

Identifiers

PMID35493873
PMCPMC9049723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.