Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35493833›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2022

Effects of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Gait and Motor Function in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Randomized Controlled Studies.

Lei Wang, Jin-Lin Peng, Jian-Bin Ou-Yang, Li Gan, Shuai Zeng, Hong-Yan Wang, Guan-Chao Zuo, Ling Qiu

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lei WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Jin-Lin PengTongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jian-Bin Ou-YangDepartment of Pain, Chengdu Integrated TCM and Western Medicine Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Li GanSichuan Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Shuai ZengDepartment of Pain, Chengdu Integrated TCM and Western Medicine Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Hong-Yan WangSichuan Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Guan-Chao ZuoSichuan Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Ling QiuDepartment of Pain, Chengdu Integrated TCM and Western Medicine Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNIntegrated Chinese Medicine (China) · CNHunan Normal University · CNTongji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to summarize the effectiveness of rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) for the treatment of gait and motor function in Parkinson's disease (PD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: All studies were retrieved from eight databases. The effects of RAS on PD were determined using the following indicators: gait parameters including step length, stride width, step cadence, velocity, stride length; motor function including 6 min walk test (6MWT) and timed up-and-go test (TUGT); the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS); and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). The risk map of bias of the quality of the studies and the meta-analysis results of the indicators was prepared with RevMan 5.2 software. Results: Twenty-one studies were included in the systematic review, and 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the meta-analysis, the results of gait parameters, namely, velocity, step length, and stride length, were statistically significant ( Conclusions: RAS could improve gait parameters, walking function, balance function, and daily living activities of individuals with PD. The application of RAS in conventional rehabilitation approaches can enhance motor performance in PD. Future studies should use a large sample size and a rigorous design to obtain strong conclusions about the advantages of RAS for the treatment of gait and motor function in PD.

Indexed as

meta-analysisparkinsonismParkinson'sRASrhythmic auditory stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35493833
PMCPMC9053573
OpenAlexW4224067197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.