Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35493735›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

Recently Evolved

Deepak Kumar, Surendra Raj Sharma, Abdulsalam Adegoke, Ashley Kennedy, Holly C Tuten, Andrew Y Li, Shahid Karim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pre-clinical strategies and emerging technologies driving advances in the alpha-gal syndrome.Allergology international : official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Guild Dynamics and Pathogen Interactions inTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. What do we know about the microbiome ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Deepak KumarSchool of Biological, Environmental, and Earth Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, United States.
Surendra Raj SharmaSchool of Biological, Environmental, and Earth Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, United States.
Abdulsalam AdegokeSchool of Biological, Environmental, and Earth Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, United States.
Ashley KennedyDelaware Division of Fish & Wildlife, Delaware Mosquito Control Sect., Newark, DE, United States.
Holly C TutenIllinois Natural History Survey (INHS), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, United States.
Andrew Y LiInvasive Insect Biocontrol & Behavior Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA ARS), Beltsville, MD, United States.
Shahid KarimSchool of Biological, Environmental, and Earth Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, United States.
University of Southern Mississippi · USDelaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ticks are hematophagous arthropods that transmit various bacterial, viral, and protozoan pathogens of public health significance. The lone star tick ( Materials and Methods: Here we utilized a high-throughput metagenomic sequencing approach to cataloging the entire microbial communities residing within different developmental stages and tissues of unfed and blood-fed ticks from laboratory-maintained ticks and three new geographical locations in the United States. The Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME2) pipeline was used to perform data analysis and taxonomic classification. Moreover, using a SparCC (Sparse Correlations for Compositional data) network construction model, we investigated potential interactions between members of the microbial communities from laboratory-maintained and field-collected ticks. Results: Overall, Francisellaceae was the most dominant bacteria identified in the microbiome of both laboratory-raised and field-collected Conclusion: This study is the first to catalog the microbiome of

Indexed as

Food HypersensitivityFrancisellaTicksAmblyommaAnimalsBacteriaCoxiellaHumansUnited Statesalpha-gal syndromeAmblyomma americanumendosymbiontslone star tickmicrobiometicks

Identifiers

PMID35493735
PMCPMC9039623
OpenAlexW4226541435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.