Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35493693›Full record

ArticleACS sustainable chemistry & engineering2022

A Comparison of Environmental Impact of Various Silicas Using a Green Chemistry Evaluator.

Carlos Brambila, Peter Boyd, Amber Keegan, Pankaj Sharma, Caleb Vetter, Ettigounder Ponnusamy, Siddharth V Patwardhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mesoporous SBA-16/SOScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  8. Meeting the UN Sustainable Development Goals with Mechanochemistry.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carlos BrambilaGreen Nanomaterials Research Group, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom.
Peter BoydGreen Nanomaterials Research Group, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom.
Amber KeeganGreen Nanomaterials Research Group, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom.
Pankaj SharmaSigma-Aldrich Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. (Merck Group), Tower 2, Electronic City, Bangalore 560100, India.
Caleb VetterMilliporeSigma, 545 South Ewing, St. Louis, Missouri 63103, United States.
Ettigounder PonnusamyMilliporeSigma, 545 South Ewing, St. Louis, Missouri 63103, United States.
Siddharth V PatwardhanGreen Nanomaterials Research Group, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4958-8840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To answer questions surrounding the sustainability of silica production, MilliporeSigma's DOZN 2.0 Green Chemistry Evaluator was employed as it provides quantitative values based on the 12 principles of Green Chemistry. As a first study using DOZN 2.0 to evaluate the greenness of nanomaterials, a range of silica types were considered and their greenness scores compared. These included low- and high-value silicas, both commercial and emerging, such as precipitated, gel, fumed, colloidal, mesoporous, and bioinspired silicas. When surveying these different types of silicas, it became clear that while low value silicas have excellent greenness scores, high-value silicas perform poorly on this scale. This highlighted the tension between high-value silicas that are desired for emerging markets and the sustainability of their synthesis. The calculations were able to quantify the issues pertaining to the energy-intensive reactions and subsequent removal of soft templates for the sol-gel processes. The importance of avoiding problematic solvents during processes and particularly releasing them as waste was identified. The calculations were also able to compare the amount of waste generated as well as their hazardous nature. The effects of synthesis conditions on greenness scores were also investigated in order to better understand the relationship between the production process and their sustainability.

Identifiers

PMID35493693
PMCPMC9044506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.