Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35493692›Full record

ArticleAnnals of operations research2022

Forecasting stock market volatility with a large number of predictors: New evidence from the MS-MIDAS-LASSO model.

Xiafei Li, Chao Liang, Feng Ma

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of operations research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiafei LiSchool of Economics & Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, No. 111, North 1St Section, 2nd Ring Road, Chengdu, 610031 China.
Chao LiangSchool of Economics & Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, No. 111, North 1St Section, 2nd Ring Road, Chengdu, 610031 China.ORCID 0000-0002-8535-5139
Feng MaSchool of Economics & Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, No. 111, North 1St Section, 2nd Ring Road, Chengdu, 610031 China.
Southwest Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores the effectiveness of predictors, including nine economic policy uncertainty indicators, four market sentiment indicators and two financial stress indices, in predicting the realized volatility of the S&P 500 index. We employ the MIDAS-RV framework and construct the MIDAS-LASSO model and its regime switching extension (namely, MS-MIDAS-LASSO). First, among all considered predictors, the economic policy uncertainty indices (especially the equity market volatility index) and the CBOE volatility index are the most noteworthy predictors. Although the CBOE volatility index has the best predictive ability for stock market volatility, its predictive ability has weakened during the COVID-19 epidemic, and the equity market volatility index is best during this period. Second, the MS-MIDAS-LASSO model has the best predictive performance compared to other competing models. The superior forecasting performance of this model is robust, even when distinguishing between high- and low-volatility periods. Finally, the prediction accuracy of the MS-MIDAS-LASSO model even outperforms the traditional LASSO strategy and its regime switching extension. Furthermore, the superior predictive performance of this model has not changed with the outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19LASSOMIDAS-RVPredictorsRegime switchingVolatility forecasting

Identifiers

PMID35493692
PMCPMC9039984
OpenAlexW4224884336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.