Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35493618›Full record

ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2022

JAG consensus statements for training and certification in oesophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Keith Siau, Ian L P Beales, Adam Haycock, Durayd Alzoubaidi, Rachael Follows, Rehan Haidry, Jayan Mannath, Susan McConnell, Aravinth Murugananthan, Srivathsan Ravindran and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Needs assessment of basic gastrointestinal endoscopy training: A qualitative study in Indonesia.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Article
  5. Culture of continuous improvement.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Keith SiauDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1273-9561
Ian L P BealesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK.
Adam HaycockDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.
Durayd AlzoubaidiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8308-1667
Rachael FollowsClinical Advisor, Health Education England, Leeds, UK.
Rehan HaidryDepartment of Gastroenterology, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jayan MannathDepartment of Gastroenterology, Coventry and Warwickshire NHS trust, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Susan McConnellEndoscopy Department, University Hospital of North Durham, Durham, UK.
Aravinth MurugananthanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Srivathsan RavindranJoint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1162-9555
Stuart A RileyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
R N WilliamsDepartment of Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Nigel John TrudgillGastroenterology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Andrew M VeitchDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG)
British Society for Haematology · GBHealth Education England · GBNorfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNorthern General Hospital · GBRoyal College of Physicians · GBRoyal Cornwall Hospital Trust · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBSandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSt Mark's Hospital · GBThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospital of North Durham · GBUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Training and quality assurance in oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) is important to ensure competent practice. A national evidence-based review was undertaken to update and develop standards and recommendations for OGD training and certification. Methods: Under the oversight of the Joint Advisory Group (JAG), a modified Delphi process was conducted with stakeholder representation from British Society of Gastroenterology, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, trainees and trainers. Recommendations on OGD training and certification were formulated following literature review and appraised using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. These were subjected to electronic voting to achieve consensus. Accepted statements were incorporated into the updated certification pathway. Results: In total, 32 recommendation statements were generated for the following domains: definition of competence (4 statements), acquisition of competence (12 statements), assessment of competence (10 statements) and post-certification support (6 statements). The consensus process led to following certification criteria: (1) performing ≥250 hands-on procedures; (2) attending a JAG-accredited basic skills course; (3) attainment of relevant minimal performance standards defined by British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, (4) achieving physically unassisted D2 intubation and J-manoeuvre in ≥95% of recent procedures, (5) satisfactory performance in formative and summative direct observation of procedural skills assessments. Conclusion: The JAG standards for diagnostic OGD have been updated following evidence-based consensus. These standards are intended to support training, improve competency assessment to uphold standards of practice and provide support to the newly-independent practitioner.

Indexed as

endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID35493618
PMCPMC8996097
OpenAlexW4221120191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.