Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35493616›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2022

Integrated Evolutionary Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Joint Learning of Features and Hyperparameters for Optimized, Explainable Machine Learning.

Nina de Lacy, Michael J Ramshaw, J Nathan Kutz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nina de Lacyde Lacy Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Huntsman Mental Health Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Michael J Ramshawde Lacy Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Huntsman Mental Health Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
J Nathan KutzDepartment of Applied Mathematics, AI Institute in Dynamic Systems, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Huntsman Cancer Institute · USDynamic Systems (United States) · US

Funding

Deep machine learning to delineate trajectories of vulnerability and transition to mental illness in youthK99MH118359 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DE LACY, NINA · 2019 to 2020
$314k
NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH118359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques have proved fertile methods for attacking difficult problems in medicine and public health. These techniques have garnered strong interest for the analysis of the large, multi-domain open science datasets that are increasingly available in health research. Discovery science in large datasets is challenging given the unconstrained nature of the learning environment where there may be a large number of potential predictors and appropriate ranges for model hyperparameters are unknown. As well, it is likely that explainability is at a premium in order to engage in future hypothesis generation or analysis. Here, we present a novel method that addresses these challenges by exploiting evolutionary algorithms to optimize machine learning discovery science while exploring a large solution space and minimizing bias. We demonstrate that our approach, called

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautomateddeep learningexplainabilityfeature selectionhyperparameter tuningmachine learningoptimization

Identifiers

PMID35493616
PMCPMC9038845
OpenAlexW4223456145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.