ArticleJournal of diabetes research2022
Prediction of Visual Acuity after anti-VEGF Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema by Machine Learning.
Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A review of optimization strategies for deep and machine learning in diabetic macular edema.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-based fluid quantification predicts clinical outcomes in diabetic macular oedema eyes treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implants: DIADEMA project.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- The evolving role of artificial intelligence in optimizing treatment and patient selection in diabetic macular edema.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- OCT-PRO: A Multimodal Model Integrating OCT and Clinical Traits to Predict Postoperative Outcomes in Cataract Patients.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Forecasting of Retinal Structure and Function Using a Multimodal StyleGAN-Based Architecture.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Anti-VEGF Treatment Response in Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Predicting visual acuity of treated ocular trauma based on pattern visual evoked potentials by machine learning models.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: advancing diagnosis, precision surgery, and anti-VEGF therapy optimization.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Machine learning and optical coherence tomography-derived radiomics analysis to predict persistent diabetic macular edema in patients undergoing anti-VEGF intravitreal therapy.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in individualized retinal disease management.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Quantification of Central Macular Fluid Volume and VA Prediction for Diabetic Macular Edema Using OCT Images.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Article
- Assessment of choroidal structural changes in patients with pre- and early-stage clinical diabetic retinopathy using wide-field SS-OCTA.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To predict visual acuity (VA) 1 month after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) by using machine learning. Methods: This retrospective study included 281 eyes with DME receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment from January 1, 2019, to April 1, 2021. Eighteen features from electronic medical records and measurements data from OCT images were extracted. The data obtained from January 1, 2019, to November 1, 2020, were used as the training set; the data obtained from November 1, 2020, to April 1, 2021, were used as the validation set. Six different machine learning algorithms were used to predict VA in patients after anti-VEGF therapy. After the initial detailed investigation, we designed an optimization model for convenient application. The VA predicted by machine learning was compared with the ground truth. Results: The ensemble algorithm (linear regression + random forest regressor) performed best in VA and VA variance predictions. In the validation set, the mean absolute errors (MAEs) of VA predictions were 0.137-0.153 logMAR (within 7-8 letters), and the mean square errors (MSEs) were 0.033-0.045 logMAR (within 2-3 letters) for the 1-month VA predictions, respectively. For the prediction of VA variance at 1 month, the MAEs were 0.164-0.169 logMAR (within 9 letters), and the MSEs were 0.056-0.059 logMAR (within 3 letters), respectively. Conclusions: Our machine learning models could accurately predict VA and VA variance in DME patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy 1 month after, which would be much valuable to guide precise individualized interventions and manage expectations in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.