Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35493513›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2022

Impact of Manufacturing Procedures on CAR T Cell Functionality.

Norihiro Watanabe, Feiyan Mo, Mary Kathryn McKenna

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Cellular immunotherapy in melanoma: the next frontier in cancer treatment.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Cationic mRNA Lipid Nanoparticles for Ex Vivo NanoCAR-T Cell Engineering.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Norihiro WatanabeCenter for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States.
Feiyan MoCenter for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States.
Mary Kathryn McKennaCenter for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States.
Baylor College of Medicine · USHouston Methodist · USMethodist Hospital · US

Funding

Training In Cell and Gene TherapyT32HL092332 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MALCOLM K. BRENNER, Bruno Di Stefano · 2008 to 2026
$6.9M
Improving the Efficacy of Allogeneic Cell Therapies of CancerF99CA253757 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MO, FEIYAN · 2020 to 2021
$93k
NCI NIH HHS F99 CA253757NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL092332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) modified T cell therapy has rapidly expanded in the past few decades. As of today, there are six CAR T cell products that have been approved by the FDA: KYMRIAH (tisagenlecleucel, CD19 CAR T cells), YESCARTA (axicabtagene ciloleucel, CD19 CAR T cells), TECARTUS (brexucabtagene autoleucel, CD19 CAR T cells), BREYANZI (lisocabtagene maraleucel, CD19 CAR T cells), ABECMA (idecabtagene vicleucel, BCMA CAR T cells) and CARVYKTI (ciltacabtagene autoleucel, BCMA CAR T cells). With this clinical success, CAR T cell therapy has become one of the most promising treatment options to combat cancers. Current research efforts focus on further potentiating its efficacy in non-responding patients and solid tumor settings. To achieve this, recent evidence suggested that, apart from developing next-generation CAR T cells with additional genetic modifications,

Indexed as

NeoplasmsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAntigens, CD19B-Cell Maturation AntigenHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveT-LymphocytesAntigens, CD19B-Cell Maturation Antigenidecabtagene vicleucelReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCAR T cellcryopreservationculture mediacytokinesex vivo expansionmanufacturing timepharmacological inhibitorserum

Identifiers

PMID35493513
PMCPMC9043864
OpenAlexW4223521732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.