Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35493506›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Weak Expression of Terminal Complement in Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection of the Kidney.

Gesa Tiller, Rosa G M Lammerts, Jessy J Karijosemito, Firas F Alkaff, Arjan Diepstra, Robert A Pol, Anita H Meter-Arkema, Marc A Seelen, Marius C van den Heuvel, Bouke G Hepkema and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gesa TillerDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Rosa G M LammertsDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Jessy J KarijosemitoDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Firas F AlkaffDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Arjan DiepstraDivision of Pathology, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Robert A PolDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Anita H Meter-ArkemaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Marc A SeelenDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Marius C van den HeuvelDivision of Pathology, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Bouke G HepkemaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Mohamed R DahaDepartment of Nephrology, University of Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands.
Jacob van den BornDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Stefan P BergerDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLAirlangga University · IDLeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The role of the complement system in antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is insufficiently understood. We aimed to investigate the role of local and systemic complement activation in active (aABMR). We quantified complement activation markers, C3, C3d, and C5b-9 in plasma of aABMR, and acute T-cell mediated rejection (aTCMR), and non-rejection kidney transplant recipients. Intra-renal complement markers were analyzed as C4d, C3d, C5b-9, and CD59 deposition. We examined Methods: We included 50 kidney transplant recipients, who we histopathologically classified as aABMR (n=17), aTCMR (n=18), and non-rejection patients (n=15). Results: Complement activation in plasma did not differ across groups. C3d and C4d deposition were discriminative for aABMR diagnosis. Particularly, C3d deposition was stronger in glomerular (P<0,01), and peritubular capillaries (P<0,05) comparing aABMR to aTCMR rejection and non-rejection biopsies. In contrast to C3d, C5b-9 was only mildly expressed across all groups. For C5b-9, no significant difference between aABMR and non-rejection biopsies regarding peritubular and glomerular C5b-9 deposition was evident. We replicated these findings Conclusion: Our results indicate that terminal complement might only play a minor role in late aABMR, possibly indicating the need to re-evaluate the applicability of terminal complement inhibitors as treatment for aABMR.

Indexed as

Complement C4bKidney DiseasesAntibodiesComplement Membrane Attack ComplexComplement System ProteinsEndothelial CellsFemaleGraft RejectionHumansKidneyMaleAntibodiesComplement C4bComplement Membrane Attack ComplexComplement System Proteinsantibody-mediated rejectionC5b-9complement systemkidney transplantationmembrane-attack complex

Identifiers

PMID35493506
PMCPMC9044906
OpenAlexW4223946347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.