Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35493353›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Urban-Rural Differences: The Impact of Social Support on the Use of Multiple Healthcare Services for Older People.

Zhang Chi, Hu Han

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Health Information Source Patterns and Dietary Variety among Older Adults Living in Rural Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhang ChiSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Hu HanSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There are many kinds of chronic diseases, high incidence and high hospitalization rate in older people caused by population aging. The increasing demand for healthcare services has become an increasingly prominent problem in Chinese society. The purpose of this paper is to explore the influence of social support on multiple healthcare services for older people and the urban-rural differences among them. Methods: The data are from our field survey in Shaanxi province in 2019. Using the Anderson model as the basic explanatory framework, this paper uses the Tobit-model to analyses the impact of social support for older people on the utilization of therapeutic healthcare services, and the Logit-model to analyze the impact of living arrangements and social support on the utilization of preventive healthcare services for older people. Results: This paper examines the impact of formal and informal support on outpatient, inpatient, and preventive healthcare services for older people, provides an in-depth analysis of the differences in the impact of social support on healthcare service utilization between urban and rural older people and analyses the contribution of various factors to the impact. The coefficient effect is divided into two parts: the coefficient "premium" of urban older people relative to urban and rural older people as a whole, which accounts for 10.8% of the total difference; and the "premium" of urban and rural older people as a whole to rural older people, which accounts for 18.9% of the total difference. The coefficient effect accounts for 29.7 per cent of the total difference. Conclusions: Rural older people place greater importance on the quantity of formal social support, while urban older people place greater importance on the quality of formal social support. The phenomenon of raising children for old age was evident in the use of healthcare services by rural older people, while the phenomenon of distant relatives being better than close neighbors was evident in the use of healthcare services by urban older people. Free preventive healthcare services in rural China have largely compensated for the lack of health benefits for rural older people.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationSocial SupportAgedChildHealth ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansUrban Populationformal social supportinformal social supportmultiple healthcare servicesolder peopleurban-rural differences

Identifiers

PMID35493353
PMCPMC9051021
OpenAlexW4224122704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.