Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35493289›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2022

Gender differences in emergency medicine standardized letters of evaluation.

Alexandra Mannix, Sandra Monteiro, Danielle Miller, Melissa Parsons, Al'ai Alvarez, Sara M Krzyzaniak, Katarzyna Gore, Daniel Eraso, Dayle Davenport, Teresa M Chan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alexandra MannixDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville Jacksonville Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0053-3339
Sandra MonteiroDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8723-5942
Danielle MillerDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine Denver Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3933-2355
Melissa ParsonsDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville Jacksonville Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6598-5224
Al'ai AlvarezDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5438-2476
Sara M KrzyzaniakDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8173-2750
Katarzyna GoreDepartment of Emergency Medicine Rush University Medical Center Chicago IL USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5310-3327
Daniel ErasoDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville Jacksonville Florida USA.
Dayle DavenportDepartment of Emergency Medicine Rush University Medical Center Chicago IL USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8094-7058
Teresa M ChanDepartment of Emergency Medicine McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6104-462X
Michael GottliebDepartment of Emergency Medicine Rush University Medical Center Chicago IL USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3276-8375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE) is a vital portion of any medical student's emergency medicine (EM) residency application. Prior literature suggests gender bias in EM SLOE comparative ranking, but there is limited understanding of the impact of gender on other SLOE components. The study objective was to evaluate the presence of gender differences in the 7 Qualifications for EM (7QEM), Global Assessment (GA), and anticipated Rank List (RL) position. A secondary objective was to evaluate the gender differences in 7QEM scores and their link to GA and anticipated RL position. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study using SLOEs from a subset of United States applicants to three EM residency programs during the 2019-2020 application cycle. We collected self-reported demographics, 7QEM scores, GA, and anticipated RL position. We utilized linear regression analyses and repeated measures ANOVA to evaluate if the relationship between the 7QEM scores, GA score, and anticipated RL position was different for men and women. Results: 2103 unique applicants were included (38.6% women, 61.4% men), with 4952 SLOEs meeting inclusion criteria. The average QEM (2.51 vs. 2.39; Conclusions: Women scored higher than men on the 7QEM, GA, and anticipated RL position on SLOEs. The 7QEM scores factored differently for men and women.

Indexed as

gendergender biasletters of recommendationStandardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE)

Identifiers

PMID35493289
PMCPMC9045574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.