Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35493288›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2022

Use of artificial intelligence as a didactic tool to improve ejection fraction assessment in the emergency department: A randomized controlled pilot study.

Ziv Dadon, Adi Butnaru, David Rosenmann, Liat Alper-Suissa, Michael Glikson, Evan A Alpert

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ziv DadonJesselson Integrated Heart Center Shaare Zedek Medical Center Jerusalem Israel.
Adi ButnaruJesselson Integrated Heart Center Shaare Zedek Medical Center Jerusalem Israel.
David RosenmannJesselson Integrated Heart Center Shaare Zedek Medical Center Jerusalem Israel.
Liat Alper-SuissaJesselson Integrated Heart Center Shaare Zedek Medical Center Jerusalem Israel.
Michael GliksonJesselson Integrated Heart Center Shaare Zedek Medical Center The Faculty of Medicine Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem Israel.
Evan A AlpertDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center The Faculty of Medicine Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem Israel.
Shaare Zedek Medical Center · ILHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into echocardiography operated by clinicians working in the emergency department to accurately assess left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may lead to better diagnostic decisions. This randomized controlled pilot study aimed to evaluate AI use as a didactic tool to improve noncardiologist clinicians' assessment of LVEF from the apical 4-chamber (A4ch) view. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled pilot study tested the feasibility and acceptability of the incorporation of AI as a didactic tool by comparing the ability of 16 clinicians who work in the emergency department to assess LVEF before and after the introduction of an AI-based ultrasound application. Following a brief didactic course, participants were randomly equally divided into an intervention and a control group. In each of the first and second sessions, both groups were shown 10 echocardiography A4ch clips and asked to assess LVEF. Following each clip assessment, only the intervention group was shown the results of the AI-based tool. For the final session, both groups were presented with a new set of 40 clips and asked to evaluate the LVEF. Results: In the "normal-abnormal" category evaluation, as related to own baseline accuracy assessment, the intervention group had an improvement in accuracy on 50 consecutive clip assessments compared with a decline in the control group (0.10 vs. -0.12, respectively, Conclusions: A study involving AI incorporation as a didactic tool for clinicians working in the emergency department appears feasible and acceptable. The introduction of an AI-based tool to clinicians working in the emergency department improved the assessment accuracy of LVEF as compared to the control group.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencediagnostic ultrasoundechocardiographyejection fractionemergency departmentleft ventricular function

Identifiers

PMID35493288
PMCPMC9045570
OpenAlexW4220707092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.