Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35493281›Full record

ArticleThe Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society2020

An investigation into specialist practice nurses' knowledge of cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines in a tertiary hospital in Gauteng Province, South Africa.

M L Botes, M Moepeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The competency of nurses in basic life support at district hospitals in Cape Town, South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M L BotesDepartment of Nursing Education, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
M MoepengDepartment of Nursing Education, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiac arrest is among the major causes of sudden deaths globally. Although out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurs more commonly, in-hospital cardiac arrest is still a major health problem. Critical care areas provide care to critically ill patients who are at risk of cardiac arrest. It is important that nurses are knowledgeable and competent in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in order to optimise the patient's chances of survival and quality of life after cardiac arrest. Objectives: To investigate specialist practice nurses' knowledge of evidence-based guidelines for CPR. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was utilised. We sampled all critical care registered nurses ( Results: The mean CPR knowledge score was 46%. A score of 84% was considered adequate for a pass, and no respondents achieved this score. The majority of the respondents (80.85%; Conclusion: The CPR knowledge of specialist practice nurses was suboptimal for the care required in high-risk settings. Further training is indicated. Contributions of the study: We showed that specialist nurses working in critical care environments at a public hospital in Johannesburg scored poorly in a CPR knowledge test.

Indexed as

cardiopulmonary resuscitationknowledgespecialist practice nurses

Identifiers

PMID35493281
PMCPMC9045508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.