ArticleAphasiology2022
Application of the dual stream model to neurodegenerative disease: Evidence from a multivariate classification tool in primary progressive aphasia.
Article in Aphasiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- How Can Graph Theory Inform the Dual-stream Model of Speech Processing? A Resting-state Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Stroke and Aphasia Symptomology.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2025Article
- Combined assessment of progressive apraxia of speech brain microstructure by diffusion tensor imaging tractography and multishell neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging.Brain and behavior · 2024Article
- Shave, shear, shred, or cut: PPA variant differentially impacts erroneous responses produced in a confrontation naming test of verbs.Aphasiology · 2024Article
- Non-Invasive Mapping of the Neuronal Networks of Language.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Word Picture Verification Performance Reveals Auditory Comprehension Deficits in Primary Progressive Aphasia.Journal of neurolinguistics · 2023Article
- Verb Frequency and Density Drive Naming Performance in Primary Progressive Aphasia.Aphasiology · 2023Article
- A Telemedicine Platform for Aphasia: Protocol for a Development and Usability Study.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
- Positive changes to written language following phonological treatment in logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia: Case report.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: A clinical diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia relies on behavioral characteristics and patterns of atrophy to determine a variant: logopenic; nonfluent/agrammatic; or semantic. The dual stream model (Hickok & Poeppel, 2000; 2004; 2007; 2015) is a contemporary paradigm that has been applied widely to understand brain-behavior relationships; however, applications to neurodegenerative diseases like primary progressive aphasia are limited. Aims: The primary aim of this study is to determine if the dual stream model can be applied to a neurodegenerative disease, such as primary progressive aphasia, using both behavioral and neuroimaging data. Methods & Procedures: We analyzed behavioral and neuroimaging data to apply a multivariate classification tool (support vector machines) to determine if the dual stream model extends to primary progressive aphasia. Sixty-four individuals with primary progressive aphasia were enrolled (26 logopenic variant, 20 nonfluent/agrammatic variant, and 18 semantic variant) and administered four behavioral tasks to assess three linguistic domains (naming, repetition, and semantic knowledge). We used regions of interest from the dual stream model and calculated the cortical volume for gray matter regions and white matter structural volumes and fractional anisotropy. We applied a multivariate classification tool (support vector machines) to distinguish variants based on behavioral performance and patterns of atrophy. Outcomes & Results: Behavioral performance discriminates logopenic from semantic variant and nonfluent/agrammatic from semantic variant. Cortical volume distinguishes all three variants. White matter structural volumes and fractional anisotropy primarily distinguish nonfluent/agrammatic from semantic variant. Regions of interest that contribute to each classification in cortical and white matter analyses demonstrate alignment of logopenic and nonfluent/agrammatic variants to the dorsal stream, while the semantic variant aligns with the ventral stream. Conclusions: A novel implementation of an automated multivariate classification suggests that the dual stream model can be extended to primary progressive aphasia. Variants are distinguished by behavioral and neuroanatomical patterns and align to the dorsal and ventral streams of the dual stream model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.