Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35493196›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2022

Predictive Value of the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score in Older Patients After Trauma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Yangfan Zhuang, Quanrui Feng, Huiming Tang, Yuchang Wang, Zhanfei Li, Xiangjun Bai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yangfan ZhuangTrauma Center/Department of Emergency and Traumatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6289-6872
Quanrui FengDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, First Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Huiming TangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yuchang WangTrauma Center/Department of Emergency and Traumatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China.
Zhanfei LiTrauma Center/Department of Emergency and Traumatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China.
Xiangjun BaiTrauma Center/Department of Emergency and Traumatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) has been developed and indicate to be a valid prognostic tool for the prediction of mortality in geriatric trauma patients (GTPs) during hospitalization. However, the predictive value of the GTOS for morbidity is still unclear. We aimed to evaluate the association between GTOS, morbidity and mortality in GTPs. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study between June 1, 2016, and May 31, 2020, and collected data for patients aged 65 years or older. These patients were treated at the Trauma Center of Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China. Clinical data were retrieved from the trauma registry. The GTOS was calculated with the following formula: age + ISS * 2.5 + 22 (if any packed red blood cells were transfused within 24 hours after admission). The outcomes were mortality, morbidity, length of hospital stay (LOS), and functional outcome at discharge. Results: A total of 485 patients were enrolled: 214 (44.1%) were classified into the low-GTOS group, and 271 (55.9%) were classified into the high-GTOS group. The median (IQR) age was 68 (66-71) years; 361 (74.4%) were male. The most common mechanism of injury was vehicle collision (66.4%), followed by falls <2 m (19.6%). The median (IQR) ISS was 18 (14-22). The median (IQR) GCS was 13 (9-15). A high GTOS was associated with high rates of all-cause mortality (13.3% vs 0.9%, P < 0.001), complications (88.2% vs 31.8%, P < 0.001), unplanned intubation (19.2% vs 1.4%, P < 0.001), and unplanned admissions to the intensive care unit (8.5% vs 0.5%, P < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, GTOS was associated with morbidity (OR 1.07, 95% CI, 1.05-1.09, p < 0.001) and mortality (OR 1.04, 95% CI, 1.02-1.06, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The GTOS is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality in GTPs, and it will help us identify patients at high risk on admission.

Indexed as

Geriatric Trauma Outcome Scoregeriatric trauma patientspredictive value

Identifiers

PMID35493196
PMCPMC9045832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.