Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35492759›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2021

Rheological characterization of poly-dimethyl siloxane formulations with tunable viscoelastic properties.

Thomas J Petet, Halston E Deal, Hanhsen S Zhao, Amanda Y He, Christina Tang, Christopher A Lemmon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dynamic control of contractile resistance to iPSC-derived micro-heart muscle arrays.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas J PetetDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond VA USA clemmon@vcu.edu +1-804-827-0446.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1401-6882
Halston E DealJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill Raleigh NC USA.
Hanhsen S ZhaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond VA USA clemmon@vcu.edu +1-804-827-0446.
Amanda Y HeDepartment of Biology, Duke University Durham NC USA.
Christina TangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond VA USA clemmon@vcu.edu +1-804-827-0446.
Christopher A LemmonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond VA USA clemmon@vcu.edu +1-804-827-0446.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9049-6366
Virginia Commonwealth University · USDuke University · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies from the past two decades have demonstrated convincingly that cells are able to sense the mechanical properties of their surroundings. Cells make major decisions in response to this mechanosensation, including decisions regarding cell migration, proliferation, survival, and differentiation. The vast majority of these studies have focused on the cellular mechanoresponse to changing substrate stiffness (or elastic modulus) and have been conducted on purely elastic substrates. In contrast, most soft tissues in the human body exhibit viscoelastic behavior; that is, they generate responsive force proportional to both the magnitude and rate of strain. While several recent studies have demonstrated that viscous effects of an underlying substrate affect cellular mechanoresponse, there is not a straightforward experimental method to probe this, particularly for investigators with little background in biomaterial fabrication. In the current work, we demonstrate that polymers comprised of differing polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) formulations can be generated that allow for control over both the strain-dependent storage modulus and the strain rate-dependent loss modulus. These substrates requires no background in biomaterial fabrication to fabricate, are shelf-stable, and exhibit repeatable mechanical properties. Here we demonstrate that these substrates are biocompatible and exhibit similar protein adsorption characteristics regardless of mechanical properties. Finally, we develop a set of empirical equations that predicts the storage and loss modulus for a given blend of PDMS formulations, allowing users to tailor substrate mechanical properties to their specific needs.

Identifiers

PMID35492759
PMCPMC9043277
OpenAlexW3212137076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.