ArticleFrontiers in physiology2022
Region-Dependent Increase of Cerebral Blood Flow During Electrically Induced Contraction of the Hindlimbs in Rats.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebral blood flow in conscious rats and implications for therapeutic interventions.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Electrical Stimulation-Induced Muscle Damage Alters Hippocampal BDNF Signaling.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Acute to long-term characteristics of impedance recordings during neurostimulation in humans.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Cerebral Benefits Induced by Electrical Muscle Stimulation: Evidence from a Human and Rat Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Acute to long-term characteristics of impedance recordings during neurostimulation in humans.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Electrical stimulation: a potential alternative to positively impact cerebral health?Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elevation of cerebral blood flow (CBF) may contribute to the cerebral benefits of the regular practice of physical exercise. Surprisingly, while electrically induced contraction of a large muscular mass is a potential substitute for physical exercise to improve cognition, its effect on CBF remains to be investigated. Therefore, the present study investigated CBF in the cortical area representing the hindlimb, the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex in the same anesthetized rats subjected to either acute (30 min) or chronic (30 min for 7 days) electrically induced bilateral hindlimb contraction. While CBF in the cortical area representing the hindlimb was assessed from both laser doppler flowmetry (LDF
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.