ArticleEpilepsy & behavior reports2022
Quantification of brain age using high-resolution 7 tesla MR imaging and implications for patients with epilepsy.
Article in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- BrainAgeNeXt: Advancing brain age modeling for individuals with multiple sclerosis.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of Brain Age for Alzheimer's Risk: APOE4 Genotype and Gender Effects.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Epilepsy patients exhibit morphological differences on neuroimaging compared to age-matched healthy controls, including cortical and sub-cortical volume loss and altered gray-white matter ratios. The objective was to develop a model of normal aging using the 7T MRIs of healthy controls. This model can then be used to determine if the changes in epilepsy patients resemble the changes seen in aging, and potentially give a marker for the severity of those changes. Methods: Sixty-nine healthy controls (24F/45M, mean age 36.5 ± 10.5 years) and forty-four epilepsy patients (24F/20M, 33.2 ± 9.9 years) non-lesional at 3T were scanned with volumetric T1-MPRAGE at 7T. These images were segmented and quantified using FreeSurfer. A linear regression-based model trained on healthy controls was developed to predict ages using derived imaging features among the epilepsy patient cohort. The model used 114 features with significant linear correlation with age. Results: The regression-based model estimated brain age with mean absolute error (MAE) of 6.6 years among controls. Comparable prediction accuracy of 6.9 years MAE was seen epilepsy patients. T-test of mean absolute error showed no difference in the prediction accuracy with controls and epilepsy patients ( Major conclusions: Morphological patterns suggestive of premature aging were observed in non-lesional epilepsy patients vs. controls and in high seizure frequency patients vs. low frequency patients. Modeling brain age with 7T MRI may provide a sensitive imaging marker to assess the differential effects of the aging process in diseases such as epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.