Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35492434›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2021

Inference as a fundamental process in behavior.

Ramon Bartolo, Bruno B Averbeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Hippocampal sequences span experience relative to rewards.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hierarchical inference as a source of human biases.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mice exhibit stochastic and efficient action switching during probabilistic decision making.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ramon BartoloLaboratory of Neuropsychology, NIMH/NIH, Building 49 Room 1B80, 49 Convent Drive MSC 4415, Bethesda, MD 20892-4415, United States.
Bruno B AverbeckLaboratory of Neuropsychology, NIMH/NIH, Building 49 Room 1B80, 49 Convent Drive MSC 4415, Bethesda, MD 20892-4415, United States.

Funding

Frontal Striatal Systems and Dopamine in Normal and Pathological BehaviorZIAMH002928 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI AVERBECK, BRUNO · 2010 to 2025
$29.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the real world, uncertainty is omnipresent due to incomplete or noisy information. This makes inferring the state-of-the-world difficult. Furthermore, the state-of-the-world often changes over time, though with some regularity. This makes learning and decision-making challenging. Organisms have evolved to take advantage of environmental regularities, that allow organisms to acquire a model of the world and perform model-based inference to robustly make decisions and adjust behavior efficiently under uncertainty. Recent research has shed light on many aspects of model-based inference and its neural underpinnings. Here we review recent progress on hidden-state inference, state transition inference, and hierarchical inference processes.

Identifiers

PMID35492434
PMCPMC9053725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.