Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35492225›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2022

Psychological predictors of delayed active treatment following active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: The Patient REported outcomes for Prostate cARE prospective cohort study.

Kathryn L Taylor, George Luta, Vasiliki Zotou, Tania Lobo, Richard M Hoffman, Kimberly M Davis, Arnold L Potosky, Tengfei Li, David Aaronson, Stephen K Van Den Eeden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn L TaylorCancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University Washington District of Columbia USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7351-0413
George LutaDepartment of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University Washington District of Columbia USA.
Vasiliki ZotouCancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University Washington District of Columbia USA.
Tania LoboCancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University Washington District of Columbia USA.
Richard M HoffmanDivision of General Internal Medicine University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine/Iowa City VA Medical Center Iowa City Iowa USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4714-7726
Kimberly M DavisCancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University Washington District of Columbia USA.
Arnold L PotoskyCancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University Washington District of Columbia USA.
Tengfei LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University Washington District of Columbia USA.
David AaronsonDepartment of Urology Kaiser Permanente East Bay Oakland California USA.
Stephen K Van Den EedenDivision of Research Kaiser Permanente Northern California Oakland California USA.
Georgetown University · USKaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Christopher K Laubenthal · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
TREATMENT DECISIONS AND PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES IN LOW RISK PROSTATE CANCERR01CA155578 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, KATHRYN L, VAN DEN EEDEN, STEPHEN K. · 2011 to 2015
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: In a prospective, comparative effectiveness study, we assessed clinical and psychological factors associated with switching from active surveillance (AS) to active treatment (AT) among low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Methods: Using ultra-rapid case identification, we conducted pretreatment telephone interviews ( Results: Delayed AT was predicted by time dependent PSA levels (≥10 vs. <10; HR = 5.6, 95% CI 2.4-13.1) and Gleason scores (≥7 vs. ≤6; adjusted HR = 20.2, 95% CI 12.2-33.4). Further, delayed AT was more likely among men whose urologist initially recommended AT (HR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.07-4.22), for whom tumour removal was very important (HR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.35-3.52), and who reported greater worry about not detecting disease progression early (HR = 1.67, 1.05-2.65). In exploratory analyses, 31% (27/86) switched to AT without evidence of progression, while 4.7% (24/515) remained on AS with evidence of progression. Conclusions: After adjusting for clinical evidence of disease progression over the first year post-diagnosis, we found that urologists' initial treatment recommendation and patients' early treatment preferences and concerns about AS each independently predicted undergoing delayed AT during the second year post-diagnosis. These findings, along with almost one-half undergoing delayed AT without evidence of progression, suggest the need for greater decision support to remain on AS when it is clinically indicated.

Indexed as

active surveillanceactive treatmentanxietylow‐risk prostate cancerquality of life

Identifiers

PMID35492225
PMCPMC9045562
OpenAlexW4200317383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.