ArticleRSC advances2020
Improved method of structure-based virtual screening based on ensemble learning.
Article in RSC advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel in silico scaffold-hopping method for drug repositioning in rare and intractable diseases.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Virtual Screening with Gnina 1.0.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Virtual screening has become a successful alternative and complementary technique to experimental high-throughput screening technologies for drug design. Since the scoring function of docking software cannot predict binding affinity accurately, how to improve the hit rate remains a common issue in structure-based virtual screening. This paper proposed a target-specific virtual screening method based on ensemble learning named ENS-VS. In this method, protein-ligand interaction energy terms and structure vectors of the ligands were used as a combination descriptor. Support vector machine, decision tree and Fisher linear discriminant classifiers were integrated into ENS-VS for predicting the activity of the compounds. The results showed that the enrichment factor (EF) 1% of ENS-VS was 6 times higher than that of Autodock vina. Compared with the newest virtual screening method SIEVE-Score, the mean EF 1% and AUC of ENS-VS (mean EF 1% = 52.77, AUC = 0.982) were statistically significantly higher than those of SIEVE-Score (mean EF 1% = 42.64, AUC = 0.912) on DUD-E datasets; and the mean EF 1% and AUC of ENS-VS (mean EF 1% = 29.73, AUC = 0.793) were also higher than those of SIEVE-Score (mean EF 1% = 25.56, AUC = 0.765) on eight DEKOIS datasets. ENS-VS also showed significant improvements compared with other similar research. The source code is available at https://github.com/eddyblue/ENS-VS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.