ArticleKidney medicine2022
What Do Acute Kidney Injury Survivors Want to Know About Their Condition: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Kidney medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Time-limited trials for acute dialysis decision-making for critically ill older patients: rationale, communication strategies, and future research.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2026Review
- The global epidemiology of acute kidney injury: challenges and opportunities.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Prevention and Management of Perioperative Acute Kidney Injury: A Narrative Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Designing qualitative research with value in the clinical and epidemiological context: what, why and how.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- Acute Kidney Injury Provider and Survivor Education: Current and Emerging Tools.Advances in kidney disease and health · 2025Review
- Perspectives and Experiences of Patients with AKI: A Systematic Review.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Community-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury: A Cohort Study of US Veterans.Medical care · 2025Article
- Pediatric Acute Kidney Injury Care: A Qualitative Study of Clinicians.Kidney medicine · 2024Article
- Acute Kidney Injury Survivor Remote Patient Monitoring: A Single Center's Experience and an Effectiveness Evaluation.Kidney medicine · 2024Article
- Improving Kidney Health Knowledge for Acute Kidney Injury Survivors: A Multidisciplinary AKI Survivor Program.Kidney medicine · 2024Article
- Pediatric AKI in the real world: changing outcomes through education and advocacy-a report from the 26th Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) consensus conference.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- Multidisciplinary Care for Acute Kidney Injury Survivors Following Hospital Discharge.Kidney medicine · 2023Article
- Acute Kidney Injury Survivor Care Following Hospital Discharge: A Mixed-Methods Study of Nephrologists and Primary Care Providers.Kidney medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale & Objective: Acute kidney injury (AKI) in the hospital often occurs with other serious illnesses that take medical priority. Despite a persistent risk of adverse outcomes following hospital discharge, AKI survivors often receive inadequate education about how best to mitigate risks once home. We sought to identify AKI survivors' perceived barriers to shared and informed decision-making regarding their AKI diagnosis and self-management. Study Design: Semistructured phone interviews were used to assess patients' perceived barriers and facilitators to AKI self-management after a hospital-related AKI event. Setting & Participants: AKI survivors discharged from Duke University Hospital in Durham, NC, were recruited for interviews to discuss their AKI experiences. Those who received dialysis for AKI were excluded because their perceptions of AKI care were hypothesized to be much different from those of patients not requiring dialysis. Analytical Approach: Twenty-four interviews were conducted between May and August 2018. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by study team members to identify common themes and discrepancies and reach a final consensus. Results: Five consistent themes emerged after thematic saturation: (1) patients were unaware of their AKI diagnosis; (2) patients lacked information about AKI and how to manage it at home; (3) patients identified a lack of understanding about AKI; (4) patients were concerned about dialysis; and (5) patients wanted to know how to prevent AKI in the future. Limitations: Limitations include recruitment from a single center, all study participants receiving a nephrology consultation, and several patients being unable to participate because of persistent illness following hospitalization. Conclusions: AKI survivors are unaware of their diagnosis, receive suboptimal education while hospitalized, and are not equipped with tools to mitigate risks following discharge. Patient-centered interventions promoting AKI awareness and self-management may improve long-term outcomes for high-risk AKI survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.