Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35492120›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2020

Enzyme encapsulation by protein cages.

Soumyananda Chakraborti, Ting-Yu Lin, Sebastian Glatt, Jonathan G Heddle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular Engineering ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Soumyananda ChakrabortiBionanoscience and Biochemistry Laboratory, Malopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University Krakow 30-387 Poland jonathan.heddle@uj.edu.pl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7384-690X
Ting-Yu LinMax Planck Research Group, Malopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University Krakow 30-387 Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7914-2164
Sebastian GlattMax Planck Research Group, Malopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University Krakow 30-387 Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2815-7133
Jonathan G HeddleBionanoscience and Biochemistry Laboratory, Malopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University Krakow 30-387 Poland jonathan.heddle@uj.edu.pl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0994-9928

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein cages are hollow protein shells with a nanometric cavity that can be filled with useful materials. The encapsulating nature of the cages means that they are particularly attractive for loading with biological macromolecules, affording the guests protection in conditions where they may be degraded. Given the importance of proteins in both industrial and all cellular processes, encapsulation of functional protein cargoes, particularly enzymes, are of high interest both for

Identifiers

PMID35492120
PMCPMC9051456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.