ArticlemSphere2022
Comparative Analysis and Data Provenance for 1,113 Bacterial Genome Assemblies.
Article in mSphere, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trustworthy Agentic AI in Bioinformatics: From Workflow Automation to Traceable and Validated Biological Inference.Biology · 2026Review
- Quantitative PCR-Based Analysis of Bacterial Profiles in Periapical Lesions and Maxillary Sinus in Odontogenic Sinusitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A foundation for tomorrow's discoveries in cell biology.Nature cell biology · 2025Article
- Whole-genome sequencing andMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025Article
- Inter- and intra-bacterial strain diversity remains the "elephant in the (living) room".npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2025Review
- UsePeerJ · 2025Article
- Article
- FAIR Header Reference genome: a TRUSTworthy standard.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- MINNO: An Open Source Software for Refining Metabolic Networks and Investigating Complex Network Activity Using Empirical Metabolomics Data.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- The ATCC genome portal: 3,938 authenticated microbial reference genomes.Microbiology resource announcements · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial resistance genes and associated mobile genetic elements in Lactobacillales from various sources.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- TheiaEuk: a species-agnostic bioinformatics workflow for fungal genomic characterization.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The availability of public genomics data has become essential for modern life sciences research, yet the quality, traceability, and curation of these data have significant impacts on a broad range of microbial genomics research. While microbial genome databases such as NCBI's RefSeq database leverage the scalability of crowd sourcing for growth, genomics data provenance and authenticity of the source materials used to produce data are not strict requirements. Here, we describe the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.