Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35491827›Full record

ArticlemSphere2022

Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in Nasopharyngeal Samples from Patients with COVID-19 Illustrates Population Variation and Diverse Phenotypes, Placing the Growth Properties of Variants of Concern in Context with Other Lineages.

Tessa Prince, Xiaofeng Dong, Rebekah Penrice-Randal, Nadine Randle, Catherine Hartley, Hannah Goldswain, Benjamin Jones, Malcolm G Semple, J Kenneth Baillie, Peter J M Openshaw and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Tessa PrinceInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpoolgrid.10025.36, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Xiaofeng DongInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpoolgrid.10025.36, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Rebekah Penrice-RandalInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpoolgrid.10025.36, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Nadine RandleInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpoolgrid.10025.36, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Catherine HartleyInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpoolgrid.10025.36, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Hannah GoldswainInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpoolgrid.10025.36, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Benjamin JonesInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpoolgrid.10025.36, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Malcolm G SempleInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpoolgrid.10025.36, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
J Kenneth BaillieThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5258-793X
Peter J M OpenshawNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College Londongrid.7445.2, London, United Kingdom.
Lance TurtleInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpoolgrid.10025.36, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Grant L HughesDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Center for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7567-7185
Enyia R AndersonDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Center for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Edward I PattersonDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Center for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3465-0848
Julian DruceVirus Identification Laboratory, Doherty Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Gavin ScreatonNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Miles W CarrollNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
James P StewartInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpoolgrid.10025.36, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Julian A HiscoxInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpoolgrid.10025.36, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6582-0275

Funding

Department of Health 200907Department of Health CO-CIN-01Medical Research Council MC_PC_19025Medical Research Council MC_PC_19059Medical Research Council MR/R502121/1Medical Research Council MR/W005611/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 205228/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New variants of SARS-CoV-2 are continuing to emerge and dominate the global sequence landscapes. Several variants have been labeled variants of concern (VOCs) because they may have a transmission advantage, increased risk of morbidity and/or mortality, or immune evasion upon a background of prior infection or vaccination. Placing the VOCs in context with the underlying variability of SARS-CoV-2 is essential in understanding virus evolution and selection pressures. Dominant genome sequences and the population genetics of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swabs from hospitalized patients were characterized. Nonsynonymous changes at a minor variant level were identified. These populations were generally preserved when isolates were amplified in cell culture. To place the Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron VOCs in context, their growth was compared to clinical isolates of different lineages from earlier in the pandemic. The data indicated that the growth in cell culture of the Beta variant was more than that of the other variants in Vero E6 cells but not in hACE2-A549 cells. Looking at each time point, Beta grew more than the other VOCs in hACE2-A549 cells at 24 to 48 h postinfection. At 72 h postinfection there was no difference in the growth of any of the variants in either cell line. Overall, this work suggested that exploring the biology of SARS-CoV-2 is complicated by population dynamics and that these need to be considered with new variants. In the context of variation seen in other coronaviruses, the variants currently observed for SARS-CoV-2 are very similar in terms of their clinical spectrum of disease.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HumansPandemicsPhenotypecell cultureclinical samplescoronavirusCOVID-19growth kineticsminor genomic variantsRNA sequencingSARS-CoV-2variants

Identifiers

PMID35491827
PMCPMC9241508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.