Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35491599›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022

Prospects for probiotics in social bees.

Erick V S Motta, J Elijah Powell, Sean P Leonard, Nancy A Moran

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
16.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Host-AdaptedMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  5. A defined community of core gut microbiota members promotes cognitive performance in honey bees.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Functional gut microbiomes enhance performance in house fly larvae.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Impact of Direct-Fed Microorganism Syrup on Honey Bee (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erick V S MottaDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9360-4353
J Elijah PowellDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Sean P LeonardDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Nancy A MoranDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2983-9769
Integrative Medicine Institute · US

Funding

Elucidating the molecular bases of species interactions in host-associated bacterial communitiesR35GM131738 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MORAN, NANCY A. · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social corbiculate bees are major pollinators. They have characteristic bacterial microbiomes associated with their hives and their guts. In honeybees and bumblebees, worker guts contain a microbiome composed of distinctive bacterial taxa shown to benefit hosts. These benefits include stimulating immune and metabolic pathways, digesting or detoxifying food, and defending against pathogens and parasites. Stressors including toxins and poor nutrition disrupt the microbiome and increase susceptibility to opportunistic pathogens. Administering probiotic bacterial strains may improve the health of individual bees and of hives, and several commercial probiotics are available for bees. However, evidence for probiotic benefits is lacking or mixed. Most bacterial species used in commercial probiotics are not native to bee guts. We present new experimental results showing that cultured strains of native bee gut bacteria colonize robustly while bacteria in a commercial probiotic do not establish in bee guts. A defined community of native bee gut bacteria resembles unperturbed native gut communities in its activation of genes for immunity and metabolism in worker bees. Although many questions remain unanswered, the development of natural probiotics for honeybees, or for commercially managed bumblebees, is a promising direction for protecting the health of managed bee colonies. This article is part of the theme issue 'Natural processes influencing pollinator health: from chemistry to landscapes'.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaProbioticsUrticariaAnimalsBacteriaBeesapiculturefoulbroodGilliamellamicrobiome engraftmentNosemaSnodgrassella

Identifiers

PMID35491599
PMCPMC9058534
OpenAlexW4225263981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.