Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35491569›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of psychiatry2022

Lack of Representation in Psychiatric Research: A Data-Driven Example From Scientific Articles Published in 2019 and 2020 in the

Sarah L Pedersen, Rachel Lindstrom, Paula M Powe, Kelly Louie, César Escobar-Viera

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Participant diversity in ACER: 2010-2022.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. An Ethics and Social-Justice Approach to Collecting and Using Demographic Data for Psychological Researchers.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah L PedersenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
Rachel LindstromDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
Paula M PoweDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
Kelly LouieDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
César Escobar-VieraDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Social Media Use and Depression Outcomes among U.S. Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Young AdultsR00MD012813 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ESCOBAR-VIERA, CÉSAR GABRIEL · 2020 to 2022
$741k
NIMHD NIH HHS R00 MD012813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe authors examined representation and accuracy of descriptions of sociodemographic identities in psychiatric research through quantifying data contained in recently published articles from a high-impact psychiatry journal.

methodsSociodemographic data were aggregated from articles (i.e., studies that provide information on individual samples) published in the

resultsWhile 90% of studies provided the age of participants and 84% provided information about the sex/gender of participants, only 43% presented information about the racial or ethnicity identities of participants. One study reported the sexual identity of participants. Lack of representation relative to 2019 U.S. Census data was found for multiple racial groups, Latino/Hispanic individuals, and women (genetic studies only). Only 25% of studies acknowledged lack of representation as a limitation, and two studies focused on health disparities or inequities.

conclusionsThese findings highlight a need to increase representation in psychiatric research and improve accuracy of language when describing the sociodemographic characteristics of participants.

Indexed as

PsychiatryEthnicityFemaleHumansRacial GroupsUnited StatesDiversityHealth EquityLesbian/Gay/Bisexual/Transgender (LGBT) IssuesMinority Issues and Cross-Cultural PsychiatryResearch Design and MethodsSociopolitical Issues

Identifiers

PMID35491569
PMCPMC9310350
OpenAlexW4225261121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.