Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35491546›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2022

The past, present, and future of traumatic spinal cord injury therapies: a review.

Stuart Stokes, Martin Drozda, Christopher Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Spinal Cord Injury Remyelination: Pathways to Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stuart StokesSpinal Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8236-3881
Martin DrozdaSpinal Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0692-0302
Christopher LeeSpinal Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9215-0476
Hull Royal Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides a concise outline of the advances made in the care of patients and to the quality of life after a traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) over the last century. Despite these improvements reversal of the neurological injury is not yet possible. Instead, current treatment is limited to providing symptomatic relief, avoiding secondary insults and preventing additional sequelae. However, with an ever-advancing technology and deeper understanding of the damaged spinal cord, this appears increasingly conceivable. A brief synopsis of the most prominent challenges facing both clinicians and research scientists in developing functional treatments for a progressively complex injury are presented. Moreover, the multiple mechanisms by which damage propagates many months after the original injury requires a multifaceted approach to ameliorate the human spinal cord. We discuss potential methods to protect the spinal cord from damage, and to manipulate the inherent inhibition of the spinal cord to regeneration and repair. Although acute and chronic SCI share common final pathways resulting in cell death and neurological deficits, the underlying putative mechanisms of chronic SCI and the treatments are not covered in this review.

Indexed as

autonomic dysreflexiaBio-scaffoldbladderscliniciansfuture therapiesGlial scarinjury to the spinal cordneurological deficitsneurological injuryneuromodulationneuronesNeuropathic bladderneuropsychologyphysical therapySecondary injuryspinal cordSpinal cord injurystem cellsStem cellsstimulationtraumatic spinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID35491546
PMCPMC9134839
OpenAlexW4225137933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.