Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35491356›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology oncology2022

Immune Biomarkers in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

María Dolores Fenor de la Maza, Khobe Chandran, Jan Rekowski, Irene M Shui, Bora Gurel, Emily Cross, Suzanne Carreira, Wei Yuan, Daniel Westaby, Susana Miranda and 16 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RNASEH2B loss and PARP inhibition in advanced prostate cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. NXP800 Activates the Unfolded Protein Response, Altering AR and E2F Function to Impact Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Growth.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

María Dolores Fenor de la MazaThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Khobe ChandranThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Jan RekowskiThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Irene M ShuiMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Bora GurelThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Emily CrossThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Suzanne CarreiraThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Wei YuanThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Daniel WestabyThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Susana MirandaThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Ana FerreiraThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
George SeedThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Mateus CrespoThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Ines FigueiredoThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Claudia BertanThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Veronica GilThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Ruth RiisnaesThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Adam SharpThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Daniel Nava RodriguesRoyal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Pasquale RescignoCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Nina TunariuThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Xiao Qiao LiuMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Razvan CristescuMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Charles SchlossMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Christina YapThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Johann S de BonoThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK. Electronic address: johann.de-bono@icr.ac.uk.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBCandiolo Cancer Institute · ITUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UKEPA EP-C-15-001Medical Research Council MR/M018318/1Wellcome Trust 219594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a heterogeneous disease in which molecular stratification is needed to improve clinical outcomes. The identification of predictive biomarkers can have a major impact on the care of these patients, but the availability of metastatic tissue samples for research in this setting is limited.

objectiveTo study the prevalence of immune biomarkers of potential clinical utility to immunotherapy in mCRPC and to determine their association with overall survival (OS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsFrom 100 patients, mCRPC biopsies were assayed by whole exome sequencing, targeted next-generation sequencing, RNA sequencing, tumor mutational burden, T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile (TcellinfGEP) score (Nanostring), and immunohistochemistry for programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1), ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), SRY homology box 2 (SOX2), and the presence of neuroendocrine features. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The phi coefficient determined correlations between biomarkers of interest. OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) from Cox regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: PD-L1 and SOX2 protein expression was detected by immunohistochemistry (combined positive score ≥1 and >5% cells, respectively) in 24 (33%) and 27 (27%) mCRPC biopsies, respectively; 23 (26%) mCRPC biopsies had high TcellinfGEP scores (>-0.318). PD-L1 protein expression and TcellinfGEP scores were positively correlated (phi 0.63 [0.45; 0.76]). PD-L1 protein expression (aHR: 1.90 [1.05; 3.45]), high TcellinfGEP score (aHR: 1.86 [1.04; 3.31]), and SOX2 expression (aHR: 2.09 [1.20; 3.64]) were associated with worse OS.

conclusionsPD-L1, TcellinfGEP score, and SOX2 are prognostic of outcome from the mCRPC setting. If validated, predictive biomarker studies incorporating survival endpoints need to take these findings into consideration. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study presents an analysis of immune biomarkers in biopsies from patients with metastatic prostate cancer. We describe tumor alterations that predict prognosis that can impact future studies.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantBiomarkers, TumorHumansMalePrognosisB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCorrelationOverall survivalPD-L1SOX2T-cell–inflamed gene expression profile

Identifiers

PMID35491356
PMCPMC7617991
OpenAlexW4225327576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.