Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35491342›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

Population immunity to measles in Canada using Canadian Health Measures survey data - A Canadian Immunization Research Network (CIRN) study.

Selma Osman, Natasha Crowcroft, Elizabeth McLachlan, Todd Hatchette, Carol Perez-Iratxeta, Eugene Joh, James Wright, Scott A Halperin, Shelley Deeks, Sarah Wilson and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Measles seroprevalence by birth cohort across the lifespan: a population-based, cross-sectional serosurvey in British Columbia, Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Selma OsmanPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Natasha CrowcroftDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Immunisation, Vaccines, and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Elizabeth McLachlanNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Todd HatchetteDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, NS, Canada; Departments of Pediatrics and Microbiology & Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Carol Perez-IratxetaStatistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Eugene JohPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
James WrightPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Scott A HalperinDepartments of Pediatrics and Microbiology & Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada; Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Shelley DeeksDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Nova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness, Halifax, Canada.
Sarah WilsonPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah BuchanPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Brian WardDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jonathan GubbayPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marc BrissonDépartement de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.
Bouchra SerhirLaboratoire de santé publique du Québec/Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada.
Alberto SeveriniNational Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Shelly BolotinPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: shelly.bolotin@utoronto.ca.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to determine population immunity to measles in Canada, and to assess the risk of future outbreaks. We tested 11,176 sera from Cycles 2 (2009-2011) and 3 (2011-2013) cohorts from the biobank of Statistics Canada's Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) using the BioPlex 2220 MMRV IgG assay. We then tested all BioPlex negative and equivocal samples using a more sensitive Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT). We determined the weighted proportion of positive, equivocal, and negative samples by age, sex, region and whether individuals were born in Canada. We found that 90.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 88.2, 91.9) of samples were positive, 4.5% (95% CI: 3.4, 5.5) were equivocal and 5.5% (95% CI: 4.3, 6.7) were negative. Individuals in the 12-19 year age band had the lowest proportion positive at 78.7% (95% CI: 74.2, 83.2) and the highest proportion of positive samples was found in those 60-79 years (99.6%, 95% CI: 99.3, 99.9). Seropositivity was consistently <90% across a broad range of pediatric and adult age bands (6-39 years). We found that a slightly higher proportion of females were positive (91.9%, 95% CI: 90.1, 93.6) compared to males (88.3%, 95% CI: 85.8, 90.7). When taking into account interaction between age and born in Canada status, we found individuals born in Canada aged 19 and under were less susceptible (OR = 0.6 (95% CI: 0.4, 0.95)) compared to those born outside Canada whereas, those aged 20 and over were more susceptible (OR = 1.7 (95% CI: 1.1, 2.8)). Our findings indicate that measles immunity in Canada is below the 95% immunity threshold required to sustain measles elimination, underscoring the importance of maintaining high vaccine coverage to prevent future measles outbreaks and sustain Canada's elimination status.

Indexed as

MeaslesAdultAntibodies, ViralCanadaChildFemaleHumansImmunizationMaleMeasles VaccineSeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, ViralMeasles VaccineMeaslesPopulation immunitySerosurvey

Identifiers

PMID35491342
PMCPMC9246716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.