Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35490600›Full record

ArticleNurse education today2022

Evaluation of the communication of nursing students in the simulated teleconsultation: A cross-sectional study.

Michel Albert Garat Escudero, Natalia Fernanda Rodríguez Núñez, Mónica Del Pilar Valenzuela Vidal, Andrea Eliana Alvarado Quinteros, Paulina Marlén Salgado Torres, Claudia Andrea González Montoya, Maria Cecilia Toffoletto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nurse education today, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michel Albert Garat EscuderoSchool of Nursing, University of Las Américas, Santiago, Chile. Electronic address: mgarat@udla.cl.
Natalia Fernanda Rodríguez NúñezSchool of Nursing, University of Las Américas, Santiago, Chile. Electronic address: nrodriguez@udla.cl.
Mónica Del Pilar Valenzuela VidalSchool of Nursing, University of Las Américas, Santiago, Chile. Electronic address: mvalenzuelav@udla.cl.
Andrea Eliana Alvarado QuinterosSchool of Nursing, University of Las Américas, Santiago, Chile. Electronic address: aalvarado@udla.cl.
Paulina Marlén Salgado TorresSchool of Nursing, University of Las Américas, Santiago, Chile. Electronic address: psalgado@udla.cl.
Claudia Andrea González MontoyaSchool of Nursing, University of Las Américas, Santiago, Chile. Electronic address: cgonzalezmo@udla.cl.
Maria Cecilia ToffolettoSchool of Nursing, University of Las Américas, Santiago, Chile. Electronic address: mtoffoletto@udla.cl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic presented universities with the challenge of virtualizing the teaching-learning process. Simulated teleconsultation has been used in undergraduate training, which allows nursing students to interact with simulated patients remotely. Studies have identified that distance imposes communication barriers on all elements-sender, receiver and message-and in both forms of transmission: verbal and nonverbal.

objectiveTo describe the communication of nursing students in teleconsultation with simulated patients in the context of primary health care.

methodsThis was a descriptive, cross-sectional study of 92 fifth-year nursing students. The communication variable was measured with the Connect Identify Understand Agree Help scale. In the data analysis, the mean and standard deviation of the scores on the 29 items of the scale were determined, as were the mean values for the total scale and for the 3 domains of the scale.

resultsThe items that presented an average of less than 1 were primarily those related to the Agree and Help to Act domain. The total mean was 1.15, and the means for the domains Connect, Identify and Understand Problems and Agree and Help to Act were 1.53, 0.90 and 1.28, respectively. A weakness in the exploration of the psychosocial context of the simulated patients was observed.

conclusionsThe results of this study, which evaluated communication in the context of distance care, corroborate the evidence regarding communication in real or simulated face-to-face situations. Studies that compare communication in various teaching-learning contexts, whether real or virtual, face-to-face or at a distance, are recommended.

Indexed as

COVID-19Remote ConsultationStudents, NursingCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsCommunicationDistance educationNursing studentsRemote consultation

Identifiers

PMID35490600
PMCPMC9357567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.