Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35490553›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2022

Gut microbial similarity in twins is driven by shared environment and aging.

Ramiro Vilchez-Vargas, Jurgita Skieceviciene, Konrad Lehr, Greta Varkalaite, Cosima Thon, Mindaugas Urba, Egidijus Morkūnas, Laimutis Kucinskas, Karolina Bauraite, Denny Schanze and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ramiro Vilchez-VargasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Section of Molecular Gastroenterology and Microbiota-associated Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany.
Jurgita SkiecevicieneDepartment of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas 44307, Lithuania; Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas 44307, Lithuania.
Konrad LehrDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Section of Molecular Gastroenterology and Microbiota-associated Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany.
Greta VarkalaiteInstitute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas 44307, Lithuania.
Cosima ThonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Section of Molecular Gastroenterology and Microbiota-associated Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany.
Mindaugas UrbaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas 44307, Lithuania; Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas 44307, Lithuania.
Egidijus MorkūnasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas 44307, Lithuania; Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas 44307, Lithuania.
Laimutis KucinskasInstitute of Biology Systems and Genetic Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Karolina BauraiteDepartment of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas 44307, Lithuania.
Denny SchanzeInstitute of Human Genetics, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany.
Martin ZenkerInstitute of Human Genetics, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany.
Peter MalfertheinerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Section of Molecular Gastroenterology and Microbiota-associated Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany.
Juozas KupcinskasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas 44307, Lithuania; Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas 44307, Lithuania. Electronic address: juozas.kupcinskas@lsmuni.lt.
Alexander LinkDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Section of Molecular Gastroenterology and Microbiota-associated Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, Magdeburg 39120, Germany. Electronic address: alexander.link@med.ovgu.de.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTOtto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman gut microbiome composition is influenced by genetics, diet and environmental factors. We investigated the microbial composition in several gastrointestinal (GI) compartments to evaluate the impact of genetics, delivery mode, diet, household sharing and aging on microbial similarity in monozygotic and dizygotic twins.

methodsFecal, biopsy and saliva samples were obtained from total 108 twins. DNA and/or RNA was extracted and the region V1-V2 of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced. Bray-Curtis similarity was used for further microbiome comparisons, Mann-Whitney test was applied to evaluate the significant differences between groups and Spearman test was applied to reveal potential correlations between data.

findingsThe global bacterial profiles were grouped into two clusters separating the upper and lower GI. The upper GI microbiome composition was strictly dependent on the Helicobacter pylori status. With a positivity rate of 55%, H. pylori completely colonized the stomach and separated infected twins from non-infected twins irrespective of zygosity status. Lower GI microbiome similarity between the twins was defined mainly by household-sharing and aging; whereas delivery mode and host genetics had no influence. There was a progredient decrease in the bacterial similarity with aging. Shared vs. non-shared phylotypes analysis showed that in both siblings the shared phylotypes progressively diminished with aging, while the non-shared phylotypes increased.

interpretationOur findings strongly highlight the aging and shared household as they key determinants in gut microbial similarity and drift in twins irrespective of their zygotic state.

fundingThis work was supported by the grant of the Research Council of Lithuania (Project no. APP-2/2016) and also partially supported by the funds of European Commission through the "European funds for regional development" (EFRE) as well as by the regional Ministry of Economy, Science and Digitalization as part of the "LiLife" Project as part of the "Autonomy in old Age" research group (Project ID: ZS/2018/11/95324).

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeHelicobacter pyloriAgingFecesHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA sequencingAgingEqualityHelicobacter pyloriMicrobiomeShared householdStomach

Identifiers

PMID35490553
PMCPMC9062754
OpenAlexW4225161492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.